It would be nice to be able to add specific details to, but not the scale of, an Outcome Criteria once it has been added to a rubric. Then, students would have specific feedback on how to meet the mastery level for that criteria on a specific assignment.
Hers states that she wants to be able to edit the scale. I do not want that to happen. I just want to add assignment specific language to the criteria that is associated with an Outcome. I believe these are two different feature requests.
I apologize, and you are correct, Gabe Lee; when I was responding, I was looking at ideas that were archived for low votes rather than the one that is currently open (and if you'd like to search through Cold Storage to review those ideas, you can do so by requesting membership to that group).
I hope you don't mind that I've edited the title and description slightly to specify that the request is for the ability to edit the language, but not the scale, of an outcome in a rubric.
The idea is open for voting.
An outcome criterion without a descriptor is not very meaningful for student feedback. Also, when no descriptor is provided, bias can creep in during scoring.
Gabe, Ability to edit state standards is currently open for voting. While the title of that idea specifies "state standards," the description more broadly relates to the option to allow instructors to edit scales and change or add to the descriptions for account-level outcomes they've aligned to their course rubrics. We encourage you to add your vote and comments to that idea.
We've marked this one for archival to keep vote totals unified.
Thanks!