To Our Amazing Educators Everywhere,
Happy Teacher Appreciation Week!
I have a professor that wants to build a "choose your own adventure" course (like the kids books do) with dozens of pages and paths students could take.
I was thinking Mastery Paths might be the way to do it but I haven't played around with it much.
Anyone have other ideas?
Thank you.
James
Solved! Go to Solution.
Thank you. As open as this professor is, I think he may draw the line at allowing students to decide to combine many small assignments to replace one larger assignment, but this is definitely something I'll keep in mind for the future.
I would recommend using an external tool similar to Twine, which is designed for choose-your-own adventure storytelling. Twine is open source and will let you build a branched story using some basic if-this-then-that logic. It produces raw HTML pages for the story, which you can upload/host somewhere. You can pull it into Canvas using the Redirect Tool (Settings > Apps), and might even be able to host the Twine pages within Canvas Files.
You might look at the work of Keegan Long-Wheeler who does quite a bit with Twine as well as as Canvas - his site has guides and examples of Twine and for using the Canvas Redirect Tool to pull in external content. Customizing Twine Web App – Learning & Coding – Keegan Long-Wheeler
Now I want to try it too. = )
Brad
Thank you. I will definitely look into it. The real problem is he wants to do this for Spring 2018, haha.
Hey @james_dannibale , are you looking at making the structure of the course into a choose your own adventure experience? Or are you looking at having students create choose your own adventure stories?
If it's the former, you may look at structuring the course using Canvas Prerequisites and Requirements. That would just be the instructional design challenge of getting all the pathways determined and the prerequisites/requirements setup right to automate student progression through the content.
One aspect of this style of course necessitates several times more possible points students can receive than what's required to earn an A. For example, in a course with 4 pathway, there may be 4000 possible points, but 900+ are where an A is earned. This is important, because it's what allows students to actually choose between content rather than having to complete all pathways (which then isn't really a choose your own adventure design at that point). Student agency and automation of the pathways are key.
Alternatively, if you're looking at having students create choose your own adventure stories, I have lots of content on this using Twine. From curriculum that I've built, to collections of Twine stories made by students (and faculty), to the many other Twine for Education resources.
Also, I've been toying with the idea of having student construct choose your own adventures stories within Canvas itself. (PS, that last link has tons of fun integrations to Canvas using this mechanism).
Happy to connect/chat on Twitter or have a video chat on this if you have questions, let me know.
Have a wonderful day James!
(PS. Thanks @brad_hinson for the shoutout/connection)
We're looking to create the adventure ourselves and have the students choose which paths (subjects) within the course are of interest to them. I've been playing around using Mastery Paths but I'm not 100% happy with it yet. I totally get what you're saying with the number of points. I currently have my "choose a path" quizzes set into their own assignment category with a weight of 0. As long as I'm able to use the Mastery Paths, it should also exclude assignments outside of the chosen path from student grades but I kind of need to play with it more to see how it'll work.
Do you have much experience with MP's? This is really my first go at it.
I'm pinging @kona here because she has a lot of experience with mastery paths.
For me, student choice runs everything in my classes (what they read each week, the assignments they do, the project they work on all semester), and I just find it easier to run all the content outside of Canvas; I cannot anticipate in advance what the students will be choosing to do! I don't define the paths in advance; the students build them themselves. Since there are 100 reading options in the UnTextbook, I calculated that there are trillions of possible paths, ha ha. Anyway, literally every student is creating a different course based on the choices they make.
To manage the recordkeeping, I have the students do what I call "Grade Declarations" where they record their work as it's completed. I don't know if that kind of "declaration" approach would work, but it might be a useful tool to take advantage of. It gets me out of the grading look completely so that I can spend my time interacting with the students on their projects. I wrote a post about it here:
I haven't implemented them myself, but the conditional roll out of materials looks intense. (Intense as an engagement feature and intense as in the granularity of conditions yields complexity when setting up. The need to account for many different scenarios.)
I'll lean on laurakgibbs's recommendation of pinging @kona if you're deep diving into Mastery Paths.
My thought definitely went to Mastery Paths when I saw this and more specifically that this might be a good use for the following hack - https://community.canvaslms.com/people/kona
That hack is actually what I set up this morning. I love it! I have the faculty member coming tomorrow to check out my sample course I set up. I'll come back to provide an update.
Thanks for the help!
Awesome! Let me know how it goes!
@kona , the professor loved it. He decided that a full course of this is a little ambitious to start out so we're going to do 2 units in the Spring along with his other stuff he normally does and then decide if we want to go bigger in the Fall.
Thanks everyone for your help and ideas!
Prototyping with 2 units sounds like a fantastic start.
Thanks for sharing the results. It's always awesome to see how conversation progresses to implementation.
Best of luck with it all @james_dannibale !
Hi James,
I don't know how much assessment, or game based pedagogy your instructor wants to incorporate into their course, but you may want to look into Gradecraft as well. It is designed to facilitate the management of courses designed under similar, "Choose your own adventure" structures!
Peace,
Phill
I am doing a project like this right now as we speak. I am not using Mastery Paths; I am hyperlinking to pages. I am happy to chat with you if you want more detail. beth.ritter-guth@ucc.edu or 908-497-4363
I think linking to pages like that is what I'll end up doing if the MP's don't work out. I really like to try to keep everything within Canvas rather than using different sites for stuff like this.
@james_dannibale , as a follow-up to @beth_ritter-gut 's helpful offer, you might be interested in this recent writeup of her work: It's Game Day in Canvas | blog.canvaslms.com
@travis_thurston and @ewander created something like this for an art course here at USU. It turned out very cool!
Do you know anything of their methods?
You may be interested in this presentation I gave. Extendable Narratives
Choose your own adventure paths can branch out quickly and become unmanageable, but there is a way to allow more curiosity in your course structure.
Thank you. One of the options I showed the professor was to be able to extend divergent paths within any one path. He was very intrigued.
Hi @james_dannibale ,
I helped a professor build a course out similar to this a couple of years ago. He came to me with the idea that there would be a number of required activities that students had to complete and a whole series of activities that were optional. He and his TA would create all of the activities in advance. Points for activities varied depending on complexity and difficulty of the assignment. So, a student could do two or three major activities to get all the needed points or they could do many more easier activities to get the same amount of points.
He also wanted the course setup so that grades were calculated using points so that students started with zero points and worked their way up throughout the quarter to whatever amount of points they desired to get the corresponding grade. You can read my blog post about setting this up at https://blogs.uw.edu/orwinr/2015/09/17/gaming-the-system-part-1-making-it-all-add-up/ . Note, I have not updated the post to reflect any changes made to Canvas functionality, so make sure to test things out in advance. I can say that you still can't use points in the gradebook if you have weighted grading turned on. This poses a bit of a problem if you want to have mandatory assignments, meaning at the end of the quarter there was a bit of manual calculation involved.
If you want more details, please let me know and I am happy to help. Now, the most interesting part of this little experiment in charting your own path through a course, was the student response on course evaluations, This was a graduate level course, and the majority of the grad students did not like having to pick their own content, many very opposed to it. These are people who are really good at "school", meaning you tell them what to do and they will happily do it. They hated having to make the decisions about their own learning 😞 The few that liked the approach, absolutely loved it and wished all of their courses functioned in this manner. Just thought you might like to know what the students thought about the approach.
Thank you. As open as this professor is, I think he may draw the line at allowing students to decide to combine many small assignments to replace one larger assignment, but this is definitely something I'll keep in mind for the future.
To participate in the Instructure Community, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign In
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.