Hi Bobby,
Thanks for your thoughtful response. I agree that discussions/forums are very useful for fostering a strong community of inquiry. I have found them to be unrivalled in the development of critical thinking skills. In fact, we are using discussions for assessed forum activity as setup by the subject matter experts and the instructional designers. We also use announcements allowing for student responses when needed, for example initial introductions. I would concede, however that in this particular use case, we do lose something where ad hoc learning could occur and indeed preventing students from initiating discussion somewhat flies in the face of a social constructivist pedagogy. But Canvas' organisational tools for discussions makes this impractical (more on that below).
With regard to your suggestion on institutional culture, we could just ask teachers not to create discussions, but that misses the fundamental point about usability in Canvas. The permissions configuration as far as discussions are concerned are nonsensical. Surely this should be addressed?
For what it's worth, we wouldn't be too concerned about additional discussion threads if there were more flexibility in terms of the organisational hierarchy. As summarised here and discussed here and here, Canvas discussions are missing a layer, with the result that additional discussions at the top layer create an untidy space unless it is carefully curated.
Nevertheless, thanks for taking the time to respond. Hopefully, if there are enough people talking about this, the Canvas developers will take notice.
Keep well.
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.