Thanks for your reply. It's unfortunate that when new changes are made to certain functions, they remove the ability to use them in efficient and intuitive ways. While the "improved" Outcomes are good at MANAGING outcomes, the "improvement" does not improve the MOST IMPORTANT intuitive function of Outcomes: view alignments and artifacts.
Outcomes are aligned with assignments and artifacts for a reason (collect data for SLOs) and the improvements should have been made to that function as well, not remove the ability to view aligned items. The new Outcomes are now no longer intuitive and efficient.
I am not sure who decides to change things and who they consult when they are thinking of changing things. Do they ask the actual users of the tools what they would like to see changed or improved or do they just hire eager script writers to improve some things without understanding everything that is integrated with the things they want to change?
Was there any discussion about WHY the ability to view aligned items needed to be removed from the "improved" Outcomes function? If there was, why wasn't it announced in the release notes that this function would not be part of the improvements?
For now our campus has disabled the new outcomes management since we need to be able to track SLO alignments. Hoping Instructure will truly make the changes to actually improve the Outcomes with the new management functions and the alignment view functions together.
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.