The simpler for the end user (markers) the better! I agree in principle with the suggestion but instead of using,≥ how about using less than (<) As an example of why this is important for my department, a total of 50% is graded at a D. anything below 50% is graded at an E. This logic is followed for all grade ranges. Say, for example, a criterion was worth 10 marks. Our bottom range would want to be 0 to <5. The next range would then start at 5. The top range (A range) would be the top 15%, so 8.5 to <10 (with another range set to 10 points to capture full marks)   Which looks easier for a marker (especially a marker for whom mathematics isn't their strong suit)? (E range)    0 to <5         or      4.99 to >0 (B range)    7 to <8.5      or      8.49 to >6.99 (A range)    8.5 to <10    or      10 to > 8.49 ... View more