You may have this all figured out by now, but just in case...
My suggestion is to revisit some of the structures you committed to early.
Consider learning to use the Rubric tool in Canvas and make it your friend. I recommend that you write everything first in a WordDoc and get the wording perfected. Also go high-to-low on ratings regardless of your preference in the past because fighting the tool will exhaust you and trying to compose in a tiny box is a lot harder than copy/paste.
Possible Solution
Leverage the Discussion Tool.
- Have each student post their initial assignments for all to see.
- Students can self-sort and "claim" 4 other students' to review by replying with their name.
- If your goal is anonymity--since the reviewer usually learns more than the reviewed student-- you can have those same student submit their reviews to you directly in a second assignment.
- If you want students to share their reviews publicly, be sure to provide strong guidelines for communication and examples of acceptable work.
- If you want to take the burden of sorting names yourself, you can post a list.
The biggest question of whether or not to use the Peer Review tool or the Discussions tool is "How private and anonymous do the reviews need to be?"
If you are expecting scholarly detail, supply a clear templated WordDoc your reviewers can download, fill out, and resubmit as an Assignment to save errors and confusion.
P.s. I've used the Peer review tool and like it, but it is indeed complicated and, respectfully, you would want to use it for assignments that bend more naturally to its programming--not the other way around.
😀
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.