The Instructure Community will enter a read-only state on November 22, 2025 as we prepare to migrate to our new Community platform in early December. Read our blog post for more info about this change.
Found this content helpful? Log in or sign up to leave a like!
I run a small peer review exercise where I assign students to review each others' work anonymously. I currently do this manually because I do not want reviews going back to the original students without staff oversight. I have intervened once when a student was incredibly rude to a classmate in their review, so I am uncomfortable using automated systems that don't allow this intermediate review.
However, my class size is about to quadruple so I need to explore other options. My understanding is that Canvas doesn't allow for this checking before students can see their reviews - can anyone confirm or have suggestions on how to manage this within Canvas?
Hey SJConnor, You are correct to be concerned about the limitations of Canvas's built-in peer review for your specific needs. Based on the documentation and community discussions, Canvas does not have a native feature that allows for instructor moderation of peer reviews before they are released to the student whose work was reviewed.
Since Canvas doesn't offer a "hold" feature for reviews, you'll need to create a workaround or use a third-party tool.
The Manual "Manual" Process (Scaling up your current method)
This is the most time-consuming option but gives you complete control. Instead of using the Canvas peer review tool, you would:
Create a "No Submission" assignment for the peer review. This would be where students submit their feedback on their peers' work.
Instruct students to submit their peer review feedback to this new "no submission" assignment. This keeps the feedback private and only visible to you.
Manually distribute the original student submissions to the reviewers (e.g., by email, or a shared folder).
You review each submission. After a review, if it is appropriate, you copy and paste the feedback into the student's original assignment comments.
This is labor-intensive, but it's the only way to guarantee you have oversight before a student sees a review. With a quadrupled class size, this might not be a feasible long-term solution.
For a growing class, your best bet is to either continue with a more manual process using the "No Submission" workaround or, ideally, to explore a third-party tool designed for this purpose.
Community helpTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign inTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign in