The Instructure Community will enter a read-only state on November 22, 2025 as we prepare to migrate to our new Community platform in early December. Read our blog post for more info about this change.
Found this content helpful? Log in or sign up to leave a like!
Like everyone else posting here, we’ve had a considerable amount of complaints from both faculty and students about the new discussion experience. It doesn’t look like Instructure has any interest in going back to the original design so we’ve been looking at ways we can customize the UI to clear up some of the issues.
I thought I’d share them here in case it can help anyone else, or to possibly get some of these improvements implemented. If you have any feedback or questions, please let me know in the comments.
Inline view starting state
Inline view replies
Split screen view starting state
Split screen tray 1
Split screen tray 2
After rereading your posting again, I realized I misunderstood. I thought somehow you had implemented these changes. Now I understand this is what you would like to see. And I agree, it meets my most important objective of making all postings, inclusive of all replies visible by default. I really like your framing for each thread and the shading for the replies. Very easy on the eyes, vs small fonts, lack of grouping, etc.
Based on another best practices shared on the community forum, I have taken to editing those student postings I want to call attention to, so that the student's original posting and my comments are contained in one posting. Unfortunately, this work around still leaves student postings not viewable by default. I perceived students feel their comments (replies) are no longer important, hence the reduction in my summer classes discussion postings.
We agree Instructure is nonresponsive.
Thank you,
~mike
Bravo! I admire the creativity as well as the end product. This addresses several issues: the collapsed default state, differentiation between the levels of posts, and button placement. How about a standard font size between the reply levels?
Of course a concern is that if such custom CSS is implemented in the theme then each and every deploy and update one must then pay attention to how code changes may impact this design. From what I have read and experienced, changes occur and these are not infrequent. That being so, the current status of the board design begs additional change and so I would be an advocate for taking on that overhead. But yes, it would be much preferred if such adjustments were the default.
Thanks. Customizations are tricky for the exact reason you mentioned. We were working on fixes for some issues but then they rolled out some undocumented "improvements" that messed them up. Right now we're going to wait it out, so all we can do is post feedback and wait until the core experience is fixed (fingers crossed).
The visuals are excellent, and Canvas should implement the suggestions you've shared here! Thank you for taking the time to do this!
Thanks, that's my hope as well. We can try and make our own customizations but it would be great if the Instructure team takes some of this feedback and incorporates it into their design work.
Community helpTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign inTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign in