1- The design that I found the most difficult to grasp, and understand is the experimental design. It was stated that initially, the conditions or variables were set, but who is the one that gets to set and determine what qualifies as THE condition or variable? I just find it very time consuming to determine what conditions or variables should be asked. People are constantly changing, so I just have to keep reminding myself of the one variable they all have in common, their age range.
2- If I were to choose a design method to do research on, I would choose the multi variable correlation design. The participants wouldn’t just be compared or contrasted in two variables(age and sex), but there could be a third variable(education)that may help to further compare or contrast whichever finding the results may lead you, and could decide which way the information may lead you to. I believe I would further use the path analysis to further help to differentiate occurrences participants may have, especially since the latter since researchers test all possible corrections among a single model.
3- Longitudinal designs are of great value and importance because they follow the same group of participants over the same amount of time, and are often very well planned out before the actual testing even begins! Practical problems that may “hinder these designs” and the “most significant” and perhaps the most obvious is that “it takes years, decades for these studies” to come to actualization, which was discussed when explaining exactly what longitudinal research entails. An example of such a study that was in the documentary was that of the Terman Study on gifted youth, which also studied a group of the same people in intervals of seven years, from the time they were seven years old, up to the age of thirty-five.
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.