The Instructure Community will enter a read-only state on November 22, 2025 as we prepare to migrate to our new Community platform in early December. Read our blog post for more info about this change.
If you were sharing at a faculty meeting and had to pick three Canvas tools that anyone could use to enhance their teaching - whether online, blended or face to face - what would you choose? I am considering speedgrader, conferences and Peer Review. Note I only have 20 minutes so it will just be a "this is it, what you can do, here it is in Canvas" quick thing.
What tools would you show?
@robin_bartolett , without question, SpeedGrader has to be one of the three tools demonstrated. I've had great success in "wow-ing" teachers of all types--higher ed, K12, F2F, fully-online, blended, what have you--with such a demonstration. I suggest you create a mock assignment that allows for annotation and have at least five mock submissions to it to show how easy it is to scroll through SpeedGrader, and I would even go so far as to create a separate assignment that displays a scanned handwritten PDF in the SpeedGrader, so F2F teachers--especially math--can see how easily they can grade their students' worksheets in SpeedGrader, Then show them how the grade entered in SpeedGrader automatically populates the Gradebook, as this is something teachers who are accustomed to working in other LMSs really appreciate.
My personal preference for the next item would be Modules--how to design them to control the release of content and how to leverage them to create Mastery Paths. Again, given the time limitation just showing a sample set of modules with prerequisites and requirements would probably do the trick.
Conferences would be a great third option.
But I would save SpeedGrader for last. They usually go away smiling. ![]()
My Top 3:
My top tool outside of Canvas: Turnitin's new Feedback Studio- it's such a game changer!
Using Modules is something my students REALLY like, and it's another big difference from D2L which we used until this year. A tip I'm sharing with other faculty: keep the modules list fresh by moving old modules down to the bottom of the page. 🙂
1: SpeedGrader
2: Conferences
3: Discussion Forums done right--Video responses combined with students asking the questions instead of given a question by a teacher.
Speedgrader
Conferences
Chat
Great idea, by the way! I think I'll try it with my staff! Thanks!
Not a tool, but a Canvas feature that I really like is the due date versus available until for soft/hard deadlines in Canvas. We used D2L for 10 years at my school, and it did not have that option, so I've been mentioning it to all the faculty I know. Why? Because it really helps students who need some flexibility! From my blog:
Advice: Use the Canvas “Grace Period” – Teaching with Canvas
My top three picks would be SpeedGrader, Pages, and Discussions. I agree with everything that's been said already about SpeedGrader, and I LOVE showing faculty how easy it is to begin doing online grading using SpeedGrader. But regarding other Canvas features that can help to enhance teaching across a range of course types, Pages and Discussions can add a lot of flexibility to courses.
Pages: Canvas's wiki pages can be used in a wide range of ways, from curating current course information on the home page (links to readings, assignments, additional resources) to providing special purposes pages with supplemental resources, embedded videos, images, you name it. Pages can also be configured to allow students to edit them, which opens up the possibility for crowd-sourcing assignments (a favorite strategy of mine for both face-to-face and online classes). And BONUS: familiarity with the Rich Content Editor and Content Selector in Pages helps with other features in Canvas.
Discussions: Discussions can provide a mechanism for many different types of interactions that can enhance teaching and learning. This might be a semester-long FAQ discussion where students post questions, or a graded class-wide or group discussion assignment. Discussions are a common feature of online courses, but they can also be useful in face-to-face and hybrid courses. Plus, it's one of the few mechanisms available in Canvas where students can easily share work with others in the class. And Discussions can also be configured for use as an individual semester-long journal (group discussion, where each student is in their own group).
Collectively, these tools provide a wide range of options for enhancing teaching!
I am a fan of Pages also! We have a Domain of One's Own project at my school, which gives every faculty member access to https webspace, so I can host javascripts and other dynamic content that can appear in Canvas Pages, too, which I really enjoy. I've got a demo course up with dynamic content like that in Canvas Pages:
Rubrics - How they show up on assignments, can include Outcomes
Speedgrader - with rubrics, with crocodoc
Modules - Next/Prev button wonderful!!
Cheers - Shar
I agree with most of the others. Speedgrader would be my first choice. And like stefaniesanders said -- save it for last. It has great wow potential!
Modules was also mentioned and would be on my list -- the ability to target students' navigation through course activities and content is absolutely awesome.
I think that Groups would be my third choice. My faculty use it in "traditional groups" fashion with a small number of students to work through issues, but I have also found it that a great use is to create a group of 1 so that each student has a workspace accessible by the teacher. It's an easy way for students and faculty to pass documents back and forth, communicate, and even collaborate in some instances.
I like quizzes but am far more enamored of the new quiz tool that's coming (soon, I hope!).
Cindy.
Interesting that this popped up again today. If I were respond to this today, I would not be nearly so much a fan with DocViewer as I was with Speedgrader. Modules would be my first choice for the same reasons. Groups second, for the same reason.Rubrics would be my third choice -- what a time saver. What a way to ensure transparency and objectivity when grading student work. I love the fact that we can score by value, comments, or now by rating (it still bugs me that the vertical lines don't line though 🙂 )
There is some great discussion on this post. I definitely think you can't go wrong with anything suggested here. When I meet with faculty they always seem to like the following:
We are giving the Instructional Designers area a little bit of love and just want to check in with you. This will also bring this question new attention.
Were you able to find an answer to your question? I am going to go ahead and mark this question as answered because there hasn't been any more activity in a while so I assume that you have the information that you need. If you still have a question about this or if you have information that you would like to share with the community, by all means, please do come back and leave a comment. Also, if this question has been answered by one of the previous replies, please feel free to mark that answer as correct.
Robbie
Community helpTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign inTo interact with Panda Bot, our automated chatbot, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign in
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.