We (Temple University) allow teachers to add enrollments to courses, although they have to enroll them into non-SIS sections for everybody's sanity.
For courses/sections enrolled via SIS, we developed an LTI that allows instructors to manage the provisioning & enrollment of their Banner listed courses, so they can decide whether or not to merge sections into a single course or to have all sections provisioned as separate courses. Faculty are required to provision their own courses in this way (unless the department has a coordinator who manages courses for faculty).
In addition to SIS created courses, an employee (faculty and staff) can create a few different "ad hoc" shells:
- Sandbox (for goofing around/experimenting/testing functionality/training. Can not be enrolled via SIS)
- Administrative (this is the "standard" one - people use it for seminars, "cohort" classes (all students in a year, major, etc) and anything else that is needed that isn't in the SIS
- Template (for course templates; can not be enrolled via SIS)
We also developed a tool for letting instructors search our LDAP directory for invite-less enrollments (the user isn't invited, just enrolled via the API (if the faculty wishes to send an invite, there's a checkbox).
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.