I think what you did is excellent and thoughtful but necessarily incomplete.
I love the use of tables to show a different organization of the material. I think that's a very clever way to get more information on the page and to get away from lists and scrolling. Better than tabs, even.
The main challenge in what you're doing is: there are several ways instructors like to organize their courses conceptually (big ideas first, foundations then details, historically, etc.), and several ways to organize a site: content types vs. activities, for instance (e.g, Files vs. Discussions).
Thus I tend to think a single template will be less effective than several different templates showing several different organizations.
Even showing the same content as skills vs. principles vs. historically. (This can be done for cooking, with a little research: consider the difference between a course on how to paint vs. the history of painting vs. purely aesthetics vs. socio-political issues in art.)
A second challenge is rhetorical: cooking is a skill, and in higher education, there is a cultural resistance to the idea of teaching skills--as if it's somehow inferior to teaching ideas or concepts. (Of course, you'll never understand anyone's ideas or concepts unless they are built or communicated with some set of skills, but that doesn't occur to many people.)
A third challenge is: how do instructors know what they are looking at? You might consider an annotated version in which, e.g., "Modules" says next to it "[These organize pages, quizzes, discussions, etc. into a clear sequence]" (or the like).
You might be able to create multiple templates in Canvas by creating Groups and giving each Group its own tools, so each Group becomes a mini-exemplar of a different organizational strategy. You may have to log in as several different students using a few emails, or collaborate with some peers. I've never tried using Test Student to create a Group, but that might be an option.
In short, you have created an excellent and terse model for one approach. And your choices are thoughtful and reasonable.
But dictating that one approach may be problematic, and offering choices may be more appealing for your intended audience.
Put in learning terms: if you want the learners to build a mental model of what Canvas can do for them, seeing multiple uses of the same tools may help your learners (instructors) to build a clearer mental model of what Canvas is--which is hard for newcomers to grasp.
I look forward to seeing your continued work on this!
--Edward
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.