Discussion Checkpoint - Good in Theory, but Creates More Work

[S_L]

I was excited with the prospect of the new discussion checkpoints.  It seems like a feature that should have been added years ago: include two different dates for topic replies and replies to classmates.  However, this has changed the way discussions are graded for the worst.

Since there are now different points for the different replies, our rubrics do not automatically populate grades for us.  Instead, if we use rubrics to provide feedback, we still have to manually input scores for each of the reply-types.  This might seem meniscal if students completely meet the rubric, but that time adds up amongst hundreds of grading submissions.  Additionally, students don't always meet the rubric, so that now means extra, manual calculations that we didn't have to do before.  Again, a time waster.

Furthermore, since the different types of replies are now separated, if I am grading on my phone app, which I do sometimes when I'm on the go, I cannot even see what students have replied to each other.  And, in the case of checkpoints, I now have to scroll on my phone between the rubric and manually inputting the total scores.

I would suggest the following to help make this user-friendly:

• Create an option for us to view student submissions the old way (where all a student's replies are on one page in SpeedGrader) versus the new way.  We can then choose which version will help us with what we are looking for when grading.
• Either allow a single rubric to automatically populate a total score for discussions, or provide us the option to create separate rubrics for each type of reply: topic and classmates.  Either way, make it so the rubric will populate the grade if we want it to, not forcing us to do an extra step we didn't have to do before.

This was a great feature to add, but until it has been worked out to not provide me with more work, I'll pass. 

[Chris_Hofer · Accepted solution]

Hello there, @S_L ...

Thanks for providing this feedback.  I'm not sure if you have seen this recent blog post, but I would like to direct your attention to: Addressing Your Feedback on Recent Discussion Checkpoints Changes.  In this blog post, there is a link to a survey which you can fill out to provide feedback directly to Instructure on what pain points you are currently experiencing.  Also, if you want, I recommend that you also provide your above comments as a reply to Sam's blog.  That way, she can see your feedback and share it with her team as they work to address the concerns that several have had about the recent changes to how discussions appear within the SpeedGrader.

I hope this will be of some help to you.

Take care...be well.

[MichaelBonner]

I concur 1000%.  This should be an option.  

Our district just disabled this feature because of all the complaints.  

It is a nice feature for those that want it.  But for me (and many others) the new speed grader takes us 3-10 times longer to grade forum posts.