| Idea is currently in Product Radar Learn more about this stage...|
| Idea open for vote Wed. April 6, 2016 - Wed. July 6, 2016 Learn more about voting...|
Every semester we need the students to create a peer evaluation for their group projects. We would like for students to be able to rate their group members contribution to the group project. This feature should allow the instructors to set up the peer evaluation for students to either rate themselves or students to only rate their peers. The instructor should be able to choose the type of evaluation students can give their peers like numerical rating, likert scale rating, text comments etc. There should also be an option to include the peer evaluation as a graded assignment.
Another nice option would be to automatically add the peer evaluation to group assignments. This would allow points to be deducted from the group assignment grade automatically. Usually, we had to divide the total points for the group project across two assignments: 1) the project and 2) the peer evaluation. With the option just described the peer evaluation would be included into the group project and there would no longer be a need for two assignments.
We have done the peer evaluation in survey builders like Qualtrics in the past but it is not the best option for several reasons. Student's get confused when they have to leave Canvas to complete assignments on other websites. Their activities don't get tracked in Canvas so they don't know if it will be graded. Qualtrics (at least the survey version we have at our University) is not designed to capture feedback in a round robin format needed for peer evaluations. We have to export the results from Qualtrics, clean the data, do some calculations then input the grades in Canvas. It becomes a really tedious process.
| Comments from Instructure|
February 2017 update from Mccall Smith
We so appreciate everyone's dialogue. Seeing the different use cases really helps us understand the various needs and use cases. We do not have the capacity to work on this in the next 6 months so it will be archived at this time. However, we've seen peer evaluation ideas pop up consistently which gives us great data for prioritizing.