Found this content helpful? Log in or sign up to leave a like!

prevent students from copying text from quiz question

Jump to solution
k_wullstein
Community Explorer

With AI tool use so common now with students using the quiz tool for objective testing is challenging.  It appears they can copy the text and then put it in an AI tool to get the answer.  They can do this so quickly that reducing the quiz time limit isn't effective.  I use Lock Down Browser, but that may not be enough. 

1) is there a way to prevent students from copying text from a quiz question?  

2) is there a way to hide text in a quiz question that students can't see if they copy the text? For example put the text is the color white.  When I do this and view as a student, the white text shows up when I copy the text. 

 

2 Solutions
chriscas
Community Coach
Community Coach

Hi @k_wullstein,

I don't think it's feasible to prevent students from copying text out of the browser from a technical perspective, as the world wide web just wasn't designed with that kind of thing in mind.  I'm sure there are some solutions that could be deployed, but they might end up doing more harm than good.  Continuing that line of thought, AI is being built in to many browsers, which means the AI could see the underlying webpage code and get the text directly from there anyways, so locking students out of copy/paste wouldn't really address the root problem.

Similarly, while I understand the idea of "hiding" some text, it'll probably end up with more technical challenges than it seems on the surface.  You'd need to make sure that whatever you do was also hidden from screen-readers, as you wouldn't want to negatively impact students with a disability who need assistive software like that.  You'd also have to take dark-mode into account...  While it's only available officially in the Canvas app right now, there are browser extensions that can change background color too.  If you just make white text, people using dark mode would likely see that text as normal and could again be confused.

I wish I had a better answer for you, but I wanted to get these comments out there for you and others who might come along and see this thread.

-Chris

View solution in original post

Hi @everson_50,

I have a couple thoughts for you around this.

First, as to the alt-text character limit, there are many systems that seem to suggest that alt-text should be 120 characters or less.  I haven't been able to find an exact number in any standards, so I think that 120 character thing is more of an interpretation than anything.  In reality, I think the alt-text should be as concise as possible while still fully describing/conveying the importance of the image to someone who may not be able to clearly see it.  For some images that's easy to do in 120 characters, for others it could take 1000 characters (or maybe even more), especially in an academic setting.  The accessibility checkers can't really figure out the context or complexity of an image, so they just flag anything over a certain character threshold and leave it to you to make the final decision as to whether a change it needed or not.

With that note out of the way...  I agree that genAI really has opened a can of worms for the other AI acronym (Academic Integrity).  Unfortunately, I don't think there are any real simple fixes for the situation right now.  Putting your question text as an image is likely to cause more issues for students taking the quiz than anything, and honestly won't stop students from using modern genAI tools to get answers, as they're usually able to easily read text from a screenshot/image.  In my personal opinion, there's really not a way to guarantee academic integrity on an online environment.  There are proctoring tools (or using video conferencing software to approximate those tools) and lockdown browser tools, but all of those have their own caveats and issues, and can be circumvented pretty easily by tech-savvy students.  Then there is the idea of assessment redesign, which is probably more likely to be effective, but requires a lot of work and thought, and still might not be "AI proof".

I think on some level we're in the middle of a teaching and learning revolution right now.  GenAI is putting information at students' fingertips, but that info isn't always accurate and students don't always know what to do with the info.  We'd like to continue to use the same teaching methods that have worked well enough for years, but genAI is making that a harder...  I always try to keep in mind that even before genAI (and the internet), academic integrity has always been an issue for educators.  Some students have probably been cheating since the advent of education, but certainly not all of them.  GenAI may be enticing more students to do their homework or exams in ways we'd rather they did not do, but I don't know that there's a way to turn back the clock at this point.  I also think there's more of a "feeling" that online courses have more academic integrity issues, but there is not a ton of hard date to back that up (and I do realize it's a difficult thing to get hard accurate data on)

One popular move right now is to deliver content online, but have exams and assessments be in-person.  This could potentially help reduce academic integrity issues, but as I said earlier I think most educators will admit to having issues in-person as well.  In-person requirements also remove some of the flexibility that students today (especially in higher-ed) want and need, so while I don't know that it's a universal solution.

I hope some of the ramblings of this Canvas admin help a bit.

-Chris

View solution in original post

0 Likes