As much as I know some people want an "AI detector" of sorts, both me personally and the institution I work for would be very against the idea. Unlike traditional plagiarism detection, where there is at least some hard evidence, like sentence X appears on website Y, AI detection is all algorithms and best guesses. Even with a "low" number like 1% false positives, that would be over 200 false accusations against students for us (just using the number of submissions that go through Turnitin, which is a somewhat small percentage of overall work). How do students argue against the accusation if they are innocent? It is going to become a teacher said vs student said situation, which does not really benefit anyone in the end.
I'll add that I'm a Canvas admin, but if I was a faculty I would come down very hard against cheating/plagiarism/etc, but to do so with what is essentially guessing (and maybe very very good guessing) would not be something I'd do.