Well, if you are asking….
First, let’s (meaning users) keep in mind that Instructure is a for-profit company and if Instructurecon did not “pencil out” in the business sense it would not happen. Instructurecon is a huge logistical feat and very expensive even with the fees charged. It really is a huge PR marketing event that happens to be useful and a brilliant way to build community – it helps make Canvas a "sticky" platform.
And I think that is key, the idea that Canvas is a platform (and not an LMS per se), and like all technology platforms it becomes an infrastructure for actions by others (think Apple App Store). This platform approach is part of genius behind Instructure’s success, that and running it using a modern SAS model.
What makes a good conference is, I think, what make a good conference session:
- Practical: show me how to do X [mechanical/technical]
- Actual: tell me how to use x in context [examples]
- Conceptual: tell me why I should use x [how does it meet broader pedagogical goals?]
I would add that (as we say in Santa Cruz) it also is a chance to be less bummed out and get stoked around geeking out with like-minded folks.
So, here is (IMHO) what I think we should be looking to do in future Instructurecons.
Better Detail on Sessions
When people submit session proposals, have them fill out a form that provides basic information on the topic.
- Track (K-12, Higher Ed, etc.)
- Intended audience (teachers/designers/technical/admin)
- Level of access/expertise needed
- The main take-aways (what will you leave with knowing).
This will also help staff balance the program so there is something for everyone and that sessions of similar interest are not scheduled again each other.
Presenter ID Badges with the session title. Easier to spot people and maybe ask questions about sessions, especially if you missed one.
Chill-lax Zones
Have spaces, like a Canvas Café, where we can go and meet participants and staff (where it is quiet) and have good discussions. For me, these discussions are always the meat of any conference.
Get Meta
Over four Instructurecons I have talked to maybe 100 peers ranging from instructional designers, to technical staff, to teachers, and administrators in K-12, higher ed, and corporate training, not to mention dozens of vendors and staff. Without exception we all know and generally agree what the challenges are (outside of pay and funding) for education broadly and feel that Canvas provides a platform, and an opportunity, to structurally address some of these issues.
Therefore, I would like to see some salons where we can discuss some of the big issues that face the future of education and how we can take action to take education where it needs to go. Sort of an informal think tank. This would be less about politics and more about structural changes.
Make/Collect Data
Instructurecon would be a great opportunity to conduct focus groups on different uses and aspects of Canvas. For example, when looking at the new Speedgrader, one of the UI team showed my how the “to do” list would pop up after completing grading and I asked if I could turn that off. He was surprised and I told him I do not use the To Do List function, as it does not fit my grading process. This is the type of qualitative feedback that Instructure is missing out on. It would be a huge benefit to both users and Instructure. Granted, as a qualitative social scientists I am bit bias, but why not use the opportunity to really grab some serious data from users?
Build Stuff
Perhaps have one or several projects we can all get together and work on that combine technical and instructional design/teaching skills that we can post on the Commons.
Conversely, have those who have build innovative resources hang out and help people make their own or give them a tour. For example, students commons and advising hubs.
-TED